Patient-facing chatbots and agents: what the evidence shows

Chatbots and voice agents that talk with patients directly, for symptom checking and triage, pre-visit intake and health-system phone calls.

These tools talk with patients directly: symptom checkers suggest possible conditions and how urgently to seek care, intake chatbots take a history before a visit, and voice agents call patients for health systems. FDA has said it intends to exercise enforcement discretion for symptom-checklist software that suggests possible conditions and when to see a clinician.

A 2022 systematic review of 10 studies found symptom checkers' primary-diagnosis accuracy ranged from 19% to 37.9% and triage accuracy from 48.8% to 90.1%. A five-year follow-up of 22 apps found median triage accuracy of 55.8% in 2020, close to 59.1% in 2015. In a randomized study of 1,298 members of the public, large language models alone identified the right conditions in 94.9% of scenarios, but participants using them identified relevant conditions in fewer than 34.5% of cases, no better than a control group. In a vignette test, OpenAI's consumer ChatGPT Health under-triaged 52% of gold-standard emergencies. Open questions include effects on where patients seek care and on their outcomes.

The tools reviewed in this category

General information, not medical advice. Every fact links to its source, and the page shows the date it was last reviewed.