What applies to a physician in California

A guide to the entries on this map, not legal advice. Whether a law covers you depends on its text, its thresholds and its exemptions; check the entry and its sources, and ask counsel before you rely on it.

Applies to you

3 entries

  • CaliforniaIn forceIn force since Jan. 1, 2025
    AB 3030, Health Care Services: Artificial Intelligence

    Applies to: Health facilities, clinics, physician's offices and group practice offices that use generative AI to generate patient communications about clinical information

    Binds health facilities, clinics, physician's offices and group practices that use generative AI for clinical patient messages; a physician's violation goes to the medical boards.

  • CaliforniaIn forceIn force since Jan. 13, 2025
    Attorney General's Legal Advisory on the Application of Existing California Law to Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

    Applies to: Health care providers, insurers, vendors, investors and other entities that develop, sell or use AI in health care

    Guidance on existing California law binding health care providers, physicians and provider entities alike, including the bar on delegating the practice of medicine to AI.

  • CaliforniaEnactedTakes effect Jan. 1, 2027
    AB 1979, Health Care Services: Artificial Intelligence

    Applies to: Businesses offering health care chatbots to consumers; health facilities, clinics, physician's offices and group practice offices

    Binds health facilities, clinics, physician's offices and group practices on decision support and licensed functions, and sends physicians' violations to the medical boards, so physicians are tagged too.

Applies to the practice or hospital where you work

14 entries

Also affects you

9 entries

Show failed bills (3)
  • CaliforniaFailed
    AB 1018, Automated Decisions Safety Act

    Applies to: Developers and deployers of automated decision systems used to make or facilitate consequential decisions, including in health care and health insurance

    Would have bound deployers of automated decision systems, including provider organizations and health plans, to give adverse-outcome notice and appeal; no duty on physicians as individuals.

  • CaliforniaFailed
    AB 2575, Health Care Services: Artificial Intelligence

    Applies to: Would have applied to employers of direct patient care workers and to those who develop, modify, select or deploy AI clinical decision support systems, when sued

    Would have bound employers and deployers of AI decision support as entities; physicians hold no duty but would have gained protection from retaliation for overriding AI output.

  • CaliforniaFailed
    SB 903, Mental Health Professionals: Artificial Intelligence (Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act)

    Applies to: Would have applied to anyone who provides or facilitates psychotherapy services, including psychiatrists and other licensed professionals and their employers

    Would have bound entities that provide or facilitate psychotherapy, their employers and licensed professionals, defined to include physicians practicing psychiatry, to limits on AI use and AI recording.

Calendar of dates laws take effect (California): subscribe or download the .ics file.

California on the map · Federal entries · About the data · How to read the law map