Anesthesiology ·
Analysis ties app-based remote monitoring to fewer complications after surgery; noise-canceling headphones cut nausea; CGM tested in surgery

Listen to this post
read by AI voices · all episodesTHE SHORT READ
An analysis of 38 studies presented at the ANESTHESIOLOGY 2026 meeting linked app-based monitoring after surgery to a 22% lower risk of major complications. A randomized trial at the meeting reported less nausea with noise-canceling headphones, and the British Journal of Anaesthesia published a validation study of continuous glucose monitoring in surgical and intensive care patients.
THE DETAILS
- Research Oct 17, 2026The analysis of 38 studies, presented at ANESTHESIOLOGY 2026, covered programs in which patients completed daily check-ins on a smartphone or web portal, some adding wearable fitness trackers or Bluetooth-enabled devices. Monitoring was associated with 22% lower risk of major postoperative complications and of emergency room visits and 15% lower risk of readmission, but total complications did not significantly decline, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists. Readmissions were lower only when a surgical team member or nurse reviewed patient-submitted information. "Just using an app may not make recovery safer," said lead author Mouad Elganga, a Toronto medical student.
- Research Oct 17, 2026In a randomized trial of 192 adults aged 18 to 65 under general anesthesia for minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, patients wore commercially available over-the-head noise-canceling headphones from the start of anesthesia until surgery ended, or no headphones; all received standard prevention medication. Within 48 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred in 35.4% of the headphone group versus 52.1% of the others, with no increase in adverse events, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists. The study, from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in Suzhou, China, was presented at ANESTHESIOLOGY 2026.
- Technology Oct 12, 2026In a prospective observational validation study of 58 patients with diabetes undergoing surgery or intensive care admission, the median absolute relative difference (MARD) between continuous and point-of-care glucose values, the primary end point, was 10.9%. Of 1,212 paired measurements, 1,186 (98%) fell within clinically acceptable Clarke error grid zones A and B. MARD was 4.5% higher (95% CI 2.3% to 6.7%) during periods of hypoperfusion.Source: British Journal of Anaesthesia
The weekly innovation roundup for anesthesiology, published every Sunday for the week before; every item links to its sources. Latest anesthesiology news · All specialties